<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rear Frame Completed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metroxfi.com/2008/02/rear-frame-completed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metroxfi.com/2008/02/rear-frame-completed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: R Deaner</title>
		<link>http://metroxfi.com/2008/02/rear-frame-completed/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>R Deaner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metroxfi.com/2008/02/rear-frame-completed/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>think the front support structure is going to
be a bit more complicated as far as making a 
stiff enough structure to keep the engine and
suspension aligned and keeping a place to hang
all of the peripherals.  given any thought to 
the flip front end idea, it sure would be trick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>think the front support structure is going to<br />
be a bit more complicated as far as making a<br />
stiff enough structure to keep the engine and<br />
suspension aligned and keeping a place to hang<br />
all of the peripherals.  given any thought to<br />
the flip front end idea, it sure would be trick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
